Bluehost vs Namecheap: Head to Head Layout

75
bluehost vs namecheap

Creating your website of starting a blog and cannot decide on which host to use? Here’s a comparison of some factors that need to be considered when choosing a host provider or an internet hosting service (click here to understand what internet hosting service is all about). In short we will be comparing two host provider in Bluehost vs Namecheap.

Features

These are very important aspects of the service. An efficient host must have features that should help the customer create, protect and benefit from their sites. There are a lot of features that can be listed, but what is important is that the basics are covered.

  • Namecheap: It has an awesome feature despite the lower pricing they have. However, there is one feature that was omitted. Just like other hosts, it offers free registrations to a domain, but these are limited. While it offers free “.website” domain, I does not give free “.com” domains. “.com” domains are most preferred, and it does not make sense why this is skipped. Apart from this, the other features are great.
  • Bluehost: It also extensive features. While majority of its features can only be enjoyed with higher subscriptions, lower subscriptions still have many features available, from creating to optimizing sites and blogs, these are covered. Hence, whatever plan a customer chooses, he will get free certificate for SSL/TLS and enjoy daily backups. Higher tiers will have ad credits, SpamExperts, CodeGuard Basics, free domain and allocated IP address.

It combines with Weebly and gives access to Weebly’s Connect through Bluehost. If upgraded, the features will include bigger storage and additional functionalities support e-commerce.

Price

Pricing is a major factor in web hosting. Some hosts standouts among the others in ambiguous pricing, but Bluehost is not among these. Namecheap is.

  • Namecheap: It provides, as the name itself, cheap hosting cost. It is among the cheapest host in the market today. Normally, not much can be expected from something cheap, but that is not the case with Namecheap. It provides inexpensive plans and communicates them clearly.

Whatever price is seen on the product page is exactly the same price the customer will pay. Also, discounts are available depending on the subscription length and renewals.

Dedicated user pay periodically, like annually or quarterly. Regardless, the amount to pay is lower than the other host providers. And they offer a 30-day trial period so that if you decide against subscription you can do so without any hassle.

  • Bluehost: Deceptive pricing happens here. Its prices are not the problem but it has a confusing way of presenting their prices so that it would be difficult to find them. It also offers a 30-day trial period
Hosting Usage

Easy to Use

Creating a site or blog is difficult as well as launching what you have done. Ease in using the host for managing your sites and blogs. Control panels are important as it would aid in the activities you doing your site.  In the middle of everything to consider, sometimes this is overlooked but can be considered again with the existence of a control panel. Its control panel is intuitive and highly functional dashboard; it even allows managing of WordPress sites.

  • Bluehost control panel: cPanel works excellently; it is integrated into the control board. This makes this hosting service’s strongest point and is a notch higher than Namecheap. Although Namecheap’s difficulty does not lie on its usability, but on the lack of polishing which Bluehost has.

Uptime and Speed

These are also very important factors in site efficiency and growth. Sites like https://www.pickaweb.co.uk/kb/what-is-uptime/ discusses why uptimes are important.

  • Namecheap: Although some hosts were found to have done this better, Namecheap’s performance went well during Pingdom test. This could still be improved.

Time is wasted usually during while receivein data, but this can be handled by compression ands caching can usually solve this issue and wwhich are not considered by Namecheap. During load impact test, it was found out that Namecheap can handle the pressure without issues.

  • Bluehost: Is one of the fastest providers. Pingdom test showed high results and showed no traces of caching and this is probably the reason why it beat Namecheap on this aspect. During the load impact test, it produced a less impressive result. VUs response time of zero millisecond and this means the test did not load at all. Multiple HTTP errors were also experienced.

Either way, these providers have both pros and cons, but choosing the best fit for your needs is important. In some cases, making comparisons may bring more confusion but when it comes to availing of services, it is healthy to compare and choose that which is nearest to satisfy your needs. With this Bluehost vs Namecheap review, and many others you will find online, you can somehow help you choose which host provider you would prefer to tap with. Consider which of the features matter most to you and weigh your options properly. The better option can still be compared to other hosting providers for your utmost satisfaction.

Leave a Reply